Korean actor Kim Soo-hyun’s agency has filed a new legal complaint against YouTuber Kim Se-eui, accusing him of spreading false and harmful rumors. The complaint was submitted under South Korea’s Stalking Punishment Act, reinforcing a prior legal action from April 1, 2025, that addressed similar allegations. The agency claims that Se-eui’s repeated actions amount to harassment and misinformation targeting the actor.
According to the agency, these false accusations are not just damaging but also constitute a criminal offense in South Korea. They argue that Se-eui’s consistent and deliberate dissemination of misleading content about Kim Soo-hyun has crossed legal boundaries. This behavior, they assert, is classified as stalking under the current legal framework, which can result in serious penalties.
The situation escalated when Kim Soo-hyun’s legal representatives took additional steps to reinforce their stance. They appealed to the Seoul District Court for stronger action, which led the court to recognize the YouTuber’s behavior as a form of stalking. The court acknowledged the seriousness of the harassment and moved to provide judicial intervention in the matter.
Following the court’s earlier decision, the agency requested provisional measures on April 22, 2025, to legally prohibit Kim Se-eui from continuing his actions. These measures were approved the next day by the Seoul Central District Court, marking another significant legal win for Kim Soo-hyun and his team. The provisional ruling adds a layer of enforcement that could deter any future misconduct from the YouTuber.
This controversy is one of several that have impacted Kim Soo-hyun’s public image recently. The actor has faced public scrutiny due to rumors about a past relationship with the late Kim Sae-ron, who was allegedly a minor at the time. Her death, which occurred on Soo-hyun’s birthday, further intensified the scandal, drawing unwanted media attention and public criticism.
Despite these challenges, Kim Soo-hyun’s agency has remained firm in addressing the legal and public fallout from the rumors. They continue to pursue justice through legal avenues while protecting the actor’s reputation. The case not only sheds light on the dangers of online defamation but also emphasizes the growing importance of legal safeguards for public figures in the digital age.